drugset / Trial / NCT00093158

Comparison of Angiomax Versus Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)

NCT00093158 ↗

Phase 3 Completed 13800 enrolled The Medicines Company
RandomizedParallel-groupOpen-labelTreatment

Summary

The purpose of this study is to show that, when compared with heparin (enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin) and routine GPIIb/IIIa inhibition (either started upfront or at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention \[PCI\]; Arm A): 1. Bivalirudin with routine GPIIb/IIIa inhibition (either started upfront or at the time of PCI; Arm B) provides non-inferior or superior overall clinical outcomes and 2. Bivalirudin alone (Arm C) reduces clinically significant bleeding. An important secondary objective for this comparison is to show that bivalirudin is not inferior for ischemic complications.

Timeline

Start
2003-08
Primary completion
—
Completion
2007-01

Outcome

Met primary endpoint

paper Bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, was associated with a noninferior rate of the composite ischemia end point PMID 17124018 ↗

paper Bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, was associated with a noninferior rate of the composite ischemia end point (7.8% and 7.3%, respectively; P=0.32; relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.24) PMID 17124018 ↗

Publications

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Subject Bivalirudin Peptide — —