drugset / Trial / NCT00246129

CamTac Trial:Campath-Tacrolimus vs IL2R MoAb/Tacrolimus/MMF in Renal Transplantation

NCT00246129

Phase 4 Completed 123 enrolled EMagnusson
RandomizedParallel-groupOpen-labelPrevention

Summary

The advent of new, potent immunosuppressive (anti-rejection) drugs over the past ten years has substantially reduced the risk of rejection after kidney transplantation, has allowed the development of immuno-suppressive regimens that do not use long-term steroids (steroid avoidance), and has improved transplant success rates both in the short and medium term. The main new agents used in these modern regimens are the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) tacrolimus; the anti-proliferative agent mycophenolate; and induction agents which are used to provide effective early suppression of the rejection process; these include monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) such as IL-2 receptor blocking antibodies (IL-2R MoAb: basiliximab and daclizumab) and the anti-CD52 antibody Campath-1H (alemtuzumab). Although almost all modern immunosuppressive regimens involve one or more of these agents, it is not known which is the safest and most effective combination. This randomised controlled trial compares two steroid sparing regimens which have been used with very good short and medium term results at St Mary's Hospital Renal and Transplant Unit over the last 5 years. The primary hypothesis is that the alemtuzumab/tacrolimus regimen is as effective and safe as the IL-2R MoAb/tacrolimus/mycophenolate regimen.

Timeline

Start
2005-10
Primary completion
2011-06
Completion
2011-06

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Comparator Alemtuzumab Monoclonal antibody
Subject Daclizumab Monoclonal antibody

Indications