A Phase III Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Acceptability and Safety of Moviprep® Versus a 4L PEG+E Standard Solution

Summary

The study was carried out as a randomised, single-blind, active-controlled, multi-centric, phase III study with two parallel treatment groups. The primary efficacy criterion was the frequency of effective gut cleansing in each of the two treatment groups (grade A or B "overall quality of gut cleansing" as judged by a blinded expert panel on the basis of videotapes recorded during the endoscopic procedure).

Timeline

Start

2002-06

Primary completion

—

Completion

2002-12

Outcome

Met primary endpoint

paper The difference fell within the predefined limit for noninferiority. PMID 18190651 ↗

Publications

• Results Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch JH, et al. Ergebnisse einer randomisierten, multizentrischen verblindeten Vergleichsstudie zur Wirksamkeit, Akzeptanz und Sicherheit einer neuen 2 Liter Darmvorbereitungslosung (Moviprep) im Vergleich zu einer etablierten 4 Liter Golytely Losung.[Results of a randomised, multi-centre, single-blinded trial to compare the efficacy, acceptability and safety of a new 2-litre gut cleansing solution versus a standard 4-litre PEG+E solution.] Z Gastroenterol 2004;42:P169
• Results Ell C, Gruss HJ.Results of a Randomised, Multi-Centre, Single-Blind Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Acceptability and Safety of a New 2-Litre Gut Cleansing Solution Versus a Standard 4-Litre PEG+E Solution.Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59(5):AB125
• Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch HJ, Dertinger S, Layer P, Runzi M, Schneider T, Kachel G, Gruger J, Kollinger M, Nagell W, Goerg KJ, Wanitschke R, Gruss HJ. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;103(4):883-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01708.x. Epub 2008 Jan 11.

Drugs

Indications

No indication recorded.