Phase I Study of Interperitoneal Chenotherapy in Patients With Gastric Adenocarainoma With Peritoneal Seeding

Summary

Stomach cancer is the most common cancer, and is still leading cause of death in Korea. Peritoneal seeding is the most common metastases of gastric cancer, and is the most frequent cause of death from this disease. In addition, there is no standard treatment for peritoneal dissemination. Even though systemic intravenous chemotherapy is the standard treatment for metastatic stomach cancer at present, it does not improve the survival of patients with peritoneal dissemination. Because intraperitoneal(IP) administration results in high concentration locally with low systemic toxicity, clinical investigators have confirmed the safety and pharmacokinetic advantage associated with IP delivery of a number of antineoplastic agents with known activity in cancer. In ovarian cancer, a large randomized trial demonstrated a small but statistically and clinically significant survival advantage for women receiving a portion of their therapy intraperitoneally. Drugs such as 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, mitomycin-C, paclitaxel and docetaxel are used for IP chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. Even the small number of phase III trials reported, some studies showed improvement in survival for patients randomized to IP therapy compared to those receiving no postoperative treatment. Irinotecan(7-ethyl-10-\[4-(1-pipperidino)-1-piperidino\] carbonyloxy camptothecin; CPT-11), clinically effective in the treatment of colorectal, lung and gastric cancer, is a carbamate prodrug metabolized to its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38). In mouse model, IP administration of CPT-11 was significantly more effective than intravenous administration for control of both peritoneal seeding and liver metastasis. However, phamacokinetics of CPT-11 with peritoneal administration in human beings is not well studied. Although Japanese investigators reported pharmacokinetic data of CPT-11 with few patients, there is no data about maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 intraperitoneally.

Timeline

Start

2004-10

Primary completion

2006-12

Completion

2007-08

Publications

• Results Guichard S, Chatelut E, Lochon I, Bugat R, Mahjoubi M, Canal P. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of irinotecan after administration by the intravenous versus intraperitoneal route in mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1998;42(2):165-70. doi: 10.1007/s002800050801.
• Results Maruyama M, Nagahama T, Yuasa Y. Intraperitoneal versus intravenous CPT-11 for peritoneal seeding and liver metastasis. Anticancer Res. 1999 Sep-Oct;19(5B):4187-91.
• Results Rosen HR, Jatzko G, Repse S, Potrc S, Neudorfer H, Sandbichler P, Zacherl J, Rabl H, Holzberger P, Lisborg P, Czeijka M. Adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy with carbon-adsorbed mitomycin in patients with gastric cancer: results of a randomized multicenter trial of the Austrian Working Group for Surgical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Aug;16(8):2733-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2733.
• Results Rothenberg ML, Liu PY, Braly PS, Wilczynski SP, Hannigan EV, Wadler S, Stuart G, Jiang C, Markman M, Alberts DS. Combined intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy for women with optimally debulked ovarian cancer: results from an intergroup phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 1;21(7):1313-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.031.

Drugs

Indications