Propofol Versus Midazolam as Premedication for Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS)

Summary

The aim of the study is to compare the intubation conditions among propofol and remifentanil versus midazolam and remifentanil in premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. At the same time, to show the group of drugs that could let the neonates with no residual sedation after the use of surfactant (the possibility of the premature neonates to be readily extubated after the use of surfactant).

Timeline

Start

2008-08

Primary completion

2009-12

Completion

2009-12

Publications

• Background SILVA,Y.P. et al. Morphine versus remifentanil for intubating preterm neonates. Short report.Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition;92:4.2007. Dani C, Bertini G, Pezzati M, et al. Early Extubation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure After Surfactant Treatment for Respiratory Distress Syndrome Among Preterm Infants <30 Weeks' Gestation. Pediatrics 2004; 113:560-563. Carbajal R, Eble B, Anand KJS. Premedication for Tracheal Intubation in Neonates: Confusion or Controversy? Seminars in Perinatology 2007; 31:309-317. Silva YP, Gomez RS, Marcatto JO, et al. Early awakening and extubation with remifentanil in ventilated premature neonates. Pediatric Anesthesia 2008; 18:176-183. Welzing L, Roth B. Experience with remifentanil in neonates and infants. Drugs 2006; 66(10):1339-1350.

Drugs

Indications