The Benefit of Prophylactic Anticonvulsant in Post Cardiac Arrest Syndrome With Induced Mild Hypothermia

Summary

Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of sudden death, but the survival rate of cardiac arrest is only 5-35%. Although, the first resuscitation of cardiac arrest patient would be success, the hypoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest is an important cause of the mortality and the morbidity. For the management of the hypoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest, American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council recommend induced mild hypothermia therapy. And, ILCOR(International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation) announced the standard treatment of post cardiac arrest syndrome(the success state of first resuscitation of the cardiac arrest patient) included the induced mild hypothermia therapy at September, 2008. The generalized seizure and myoclonus arise in over 60% of post cardiac arrest syndrome patients and they are very difficult to control. Also, the occurrence of them implies poor prognosis of the patient. Although, mild hypothermia therapy could be decrease the development and propagation of generalized seizure and myoclonus theologically, the therapy could not prevent the development and propagation of them entirely. Therefore, the use of prophylactic anticonvulsant should be needed. But, there is not randomized control study about the use of prophylactic anticonvulsant. We hypothesized that the use of prophylactic anticonvulsant to post cardiac arrest syndrome patients would decrease the rate of occurrence of generalized seizure and myoclonus and would improve the neurologic outcome. We planed that we used two anti-epileptic drugs - valproate, clonazepam - for the prophylactic anticonvulsant. The valproate and clonazepam are in general use for prevention and treatment of generalized seizure and myoclonus and are recommended to treat of generalized seizure and myoclonus to post cardiac arrest syndrome patients by 2008 guideline of ILCOR.

Timeline

Start

2010-03

Primary completion

2012-12

Completion

—

Publications

• Background 1. Willis, C.D., et al., Cardiopulmonary resuscitation after traumatic cardiac arrest is not always futile. Injury, 2006. 37(5): p. 448-54. 2. Eisenberg, M.S., et al., Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a tale of 29 cities. Ann Emerg Med, 1990. 19(2): p. 179-86. 3. Edgren, E., et al., Assessment of neurological prognosis in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. BRCT I Study Group. Lancet, 1994. 343(8905): p. 1055-9. 4. Nolan, J.P., et al., Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication.Resuscitation, 2008. 79(3): p. 350-79. 5. Neumar, R.W., et al., Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. Circulation, 2008. 118(23): p. 2452-83. 6. Kuboyama, K., et al., Delay in cooling negates the beneficial effect of mild resuscitative cerebral hypothermia after cardiac arrest in dogs: a prospective, randomized study. Crit Care Med, 1993. 21(9): p. 1348-58. 7. Weinrauch, V., et al., Beneficial effect of mild hypothermia and detrimental effect of deep hypothermia after cardiac arrest in dogs. Stroke, 1992. 23(10): p. 1454-62. 8. Sterz, F., et al., Mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves outcome after prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs. Crit Care Med, 1991. 19(3): p. 379-89. 9. Leonov, Y., et al., Mild cerebral hypothermia during and after cardiac arrest improves neurologic outcome in dogs. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 1990. 10(1): p. 57-70. 10. Bernard, S.A., et al., Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med, 2002. 346(8): p. 557-63.

Drugs

Indications