drugset / Trial / NCT01689363
Evaluation of the Allergenicity of AMPHADASE INJECTION (Hyaluronidase Injection USP)
RandomizedCrossoverTriple-blindScreening
Summary
This study is designed to evaluate the allergenicity of Amphadase® in healthy volunteers using an intradermal skin test.
Timeline
- Start
- 2012-09
- Primary completion
- 2012-11
- Completion
- 2012-12
Publications
- Background Barr J, Kirkpatrick N, Dick A, Leonard L, Hawksworth G, Noble DW. Effects of adrenaline and hyaluronidase on plasma concentrations of lignocaine and bupivacaine after peribulbar anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Dec;75(6):692-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/75.6.692.
- Background Brydon CW, Basler M, Kerr WJ. An evaluation of two concentrations of hyaluronidase for supplementation of peribulbar anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1995 Nov;50(11):998-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05940.x.
- Background Ahluwalia HS, Lukaris A, Lane CM. Delayed allergic reaction to hyaluronidase: a rare sequel to cataract surgery. Eye (Lond). 2003 Mar;17(2):263-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700243. No abstract available.
- Background Agrawal A, McLure HA, Dabbs TR. Allergic reaction to hyaluronidase after a peribulbar injection. Anaesthesia. 2003 May;58(5):493-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03154_17.x. No abstract available.
- Background Kempeneers A, Dralands L, Ceuppens J. Hyaluronidase induced orbital pseudotumor as complication of retrobulbar anesthesia. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1992;243:159-66.
- Background Minning CA Jr. Hyaluronidase allergy simulating expulsive choroidal hemorrhage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 May;112(5):585-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090170029012. No abstract available.
- Background Szepfalusi Z, Nentwich I, Dobner M, Pillwein K, Urbanek R. IgE-mediated allergic reaction to hyaluronidase in paediatric oncological patients. Eur J Pediatr. 1997 Mar;156(3):199-203. doi: 10.1007/s004310050582.
- Background Allergy testing. American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Feb 15;110(4):317-20. No abstract available.
- Background Poulsen LK. In vivo and in vitro techniques to determine the biological activity of food allergens. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2001 May 25;756(1-2):41-55. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(01)00070-6.
- Background Howard A, Mercer P, Nataraj HC, Kang BC. Bevel-down superior to bevel-up in intradermal skin testing. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Jun;78(6):594-6. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63222-x.
- Background Barbaud A, Reichert-Penetrat S, Trechot P, Jacquin-Petit MA, Ehlinger A, Noirez V, Faure GC, Schmutz JL, Bene MC. The use of skin testing in the investigation of cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Br J Dermatol. 1998 Jul;139(1):49-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02313.x.
- Background Fisher MM, Bowey CJ. Intradermal compared with prick testing in the diagnosis of anaesthetic allergy. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Jul;79(1):59-63. doi: 10.1093/bja/79.1.59.
- Background Ruzicka T, Gerstmeier M, Przybilla B, Ring J. Allergy to local anesthetics: comparison of patch test with prick and intradermal test results. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987 Jun;16(6):1202-8. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(87)70158-3.
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | rHuPH20 | Protein / enzyme biologic | 0.02 ml | Other |
| Subject | rHuPH20 | Protein / enzyme biologic | 150 iu | Other |
| Comparator | Histamine | Small molecule | 0.02 ml | Other |
| Comparator | Histamine | Small molecule | 0.1 mg/ml | Other |