A Multinational Study Comparing the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Two Medicines, Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Taken Together, or Separately, in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder
Summary
The purpose of this study was to examine how well the combination of two medicines (solifenacin succinate and mirabegron) worked compared to each medicine alone in the treatment of bladder problems, and how safe they were for long term use.
Timeline
- Start
- 2014-03-17
- Primary completion
- 2016-09-08
- Completion
- 2016-09-08
Outcome
Met primary endpoint
registry analysis (superiority test); Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg; p <0.001; Least Squares Mean Difference -0.45 (95% CI -0.69 to -0.21) NCT02045862 ↗
registry analysis (superiority test); Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg; p <0.001; Least Squares Mean Difference -0.48 (95% CI -0.77 to -0.20) NCT02045862 ↗
paper Combination therapy was statistically superior to mirabegron and solifenacin for the number of incontinence episodes PMID 29866467 ↗
paper Combination therapy was statistically superior to mirabegron and solifenacin for the number of incontinence episodes (vs mirabegron: adjusted mean difference [AMD] -0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.7 to -0.2, p<0.001; PMID 29866467 ↗
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mirabegron | Other / unclassified | 50 mg | Oral |
| Subject | Solifenacin | Small molecule | 5 mg | Oral |