drugset / Trial / NCT02049346
Comparison Among Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents
RandomizedParallel-groupOpen-labelTreatment
Summary
\* Background: Despite extensive use, to the best of our knowledge, no trial has simultaneously compared the three currently used erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) in a prospective manner, in treatment of anemia of end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. \* Patients and Methods: All haemodialysis patients in Qatar who were treated with short acting Epoetin alfa or beta were screened. Eligible patients were randomized, either to continue on the previous regimen of Epoetin, or to receive Darbepoetin alfa or continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A) for a total period of 40 weeks. All groups were assessed at the end of the study for safety and efficacy parameters.
Timeline
- Start
- 2012-03
- Primary completion
- 2013-04
- Completion
- 2013-06
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator | Darbepoetin alfa | Protein / enzyme biologic | — | — |
| Comparator | epoetin alfa | Protein / enzyme biologic | — | — |
| Subject | methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta | Protein / enzyme biologic | 120 ug | Intravenous |
| Subject | methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta | Protein / enzyme biologic | 200 ug | Intravenous |
| Subject | methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta | Protein / enzyme biologic | 360 ug | Intravenous |