drugset / Trial / NCT02049346

Comparison Among Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents

NCT02049346

Phase 4 Completed 327 enrolled Hamad Medical Corporation
RandomizedParallel-groupOpen-labelTreatment

Summary

\* Background: Despite extensive use, to the best of our knowledge, no trial has simultaneously compared the three currently used erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) in a prospective manner, in treatment of anemia of end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. \* Patients and Methods: All haemodialysis patients in Qatar who were treated with short acting Epoetin alfa or beta were screened. Eligible patients were randomized, either to continue on the previous regimen of Epoetin, or to receive Darbepoetin alfa or continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A) for a total period of 40 weeks. All groups were assessed at the end of the study for safety and efficacy parameters.

Timeline

Start
2012-03
Primary completion
2013-04
Completion
2013-06

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Comparator Darbepoetin alfa Protein / enzyme biologic
Comparator epoetin alfa Protein / enzyme biologic
Subject methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta Protein / enzyme biologic 120 ug Intravenous
Subject methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta Protein / enzyme biologic 200 ug Intravenous
Subject methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta Protein / enzyme biologic 360 ug Intravenous