H7 Influenza Prime-Boost Regimens in Healthy Adults: Recombinant H7 DNA Plasmid Vaccine, VRC-FLUDNA071-00-VP, Administered Alone or With Monovalent Influenza Subunit Virion H7N9 Vaccine (MIV) as Prime With MIV Boost Compared to MIV Prime With MIV Boo...
Summary
Background:\<TAB\> \- Flu virus that causes disease in birds can sometimes spread to people. It can cause severe illness, even death. Vaccines are used to try to create resistance to such infections. Researchers want to test a new vaccination strategy, combining two different vaccine types, the H7 DNA Vaccine (DNA vaccine) and H7N9 Monovalent Inactivated Vaccine (MIV), to see if one of two combinations offer better protection against a certain type of bird flu in humans when compared to vaccination using two doses of MIV alone. Objectives: * To see if 2 vaccines for bird flu, are safe and tolerable for humans. * To study immune responses to these vaccines. Eligibility: \- Healthy adults 18 60 years old. Design: * Participants will be screened through a separate protocol. * Participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups. Each group will get a different combination of vaccines. * Participants will have about 8 clinic visits. Each visit takes 2 4 hours. Blood will be drawn at some visits. Urine samples may be collected. * Participants will receive vaccinations at 2 of the visits, 16 weeks apart. * The H7N9 MIV will be injected in the upper arm using a needle and syringe. The DNA vaccine will be injected in the upper arm using a device that delivers the vaccine through the skin by pressure instead of a needle. * Participants will be observed for at least 30 minutes after each vaccination. * Soon after each vaccination, participants will get 1 2 phone calls, come to clinic for evaluation, and complete a diary at home for 1 week. They will record their temperature and symptoms and look at the injection site daily. * Participants will have follow-up blood tests.
Timeline
- Start
- 2014-07-29
- Primary completion
- 2016-01-07
- Completion
- 2016-01-07
Publications
- Background Ledgerwood JE, Graham BS. DNA vaccines: a safe and efficient platform technology for responding to emerging infectious diseases. Hum Vaccin. 2009 Sep;5(9):623-6. doi: 10.4161/hv.8627. No abstract available.
- Background Ledgerwood JE, Wei CJ, Hu Z, Gordon IJ, Enama ME, Hendel CS, McTamney PM, Pearce MB, Yassine HM, Boyington JC, Bailer R, Tumpey TM, Koup RA, Mascola JR, Nabel GJ, Graham BS; VRC 306 Study Team. DNA priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Dec;11(12):916-24. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70240-7. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
- Background Ledgerwood JE, Zephir K, Hu Z, Wei CJ, Chang L, Enama ME, Hendel CS, Sitar S, Bailer RT, Koup RA, Mascola JR, Nabel GJ, Graham BS; VRC 310 Study Team. Prime-boost interval matters: a randomized phase 1 study to identify the minimum interval necessary to observe the H5 DNA influenza vaccine priming effect. J Infect Dis. 2013 Aug 1;208(3):418-22. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit180. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A/Shanghai/02/2013 (H7N9) MIV | Vaccine | 45 ug | Intramuscular |
| Subject | VRC-FLUDNA071-00-VP | Vaccine | 4 mg | Intramuscular |