drugset / Trial / NCT02319135

Azacytidine (Vidaza®) Versus Fludarabine and Cytarabine (Fluga Scheme) in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

NCT02319135

Phase 3 Completed 289 enrolled PETHEMA Foundation Dynamic Solutions · collab
RandomizedParallel-groupOpen-labelTreatment

Summary

The hypothesis is that the replacement of the standard fludarabine and cytarabine based therapy by azacytidine could result in an improvement of RFS and OS rates in the experimental arm. To fulfill the medical needs in such frail and elderly population, improvements in terms of atileukemic efficacy in the azacytidine experimental arm should be attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL.

Timeline

Start
2014-10
Primary completion
2018-10-28
Completion
2019-10-28

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Subject Azacitidine Other / unclassified 75 mg/m2 Subcutaneous
Comparator Cytarabine Small molecule 75 mg/m2 Subcutaneous
Comparator Fludarabine Small molecule 25 mg/m2 Oral
Comparator Fludarabine Small molecule 40 mg/m2 Oral
Comparator Filgastrim Unknown 5 ug/kg Subcutaneous
Comparator Lenograstim Protein / enzyme biologic 5 ug/kg Subcutaneous