drugset / Trial / NCT02319135
Azacytidine (Vidaza®) Versus Fludarabine and Cytarabine (Fluga Scheme) in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RandomizedParallel-groupOpen-labelTreatment
Summary
The hypothesis is that the replacement of the standard fludarabine and cytarabine based therapy by azacytidine could result in an improvement of RFS and OS rates in the experimental arm. To fulfill the medical needs in such frail and elderly population, improvements in terms of atileukemic efficacy in the azacytidine experimental arm should be attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL.
Timeline
- Start
- 2014-10
- Primary completion
- 2018-10-28
- Completion
- 2019-10-28
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Azacitidine | Other / unclassified | 75 mg/m2 | Subcutaneous |
| Comparator | Cytarabine | Small molecule | 75 mg/m2 | Subcutaneous |
| Comparator | Fludarabine | Small molecule | 25 mg/m2 | Oral |
| Comparator | Fludarabine | Small molecule | 40 mg/m2 | Oral |
| Comparator | Filgastrim | Unknown | 5 ug/kg | Subcutaneous |
| Comparator | Lenograstim | Protein / enzyme biologic | 5 ug/kg | Subcutaneous |