drugset / Trial / NCT02433522

Comparison Between a Long Term and a Conventional Maintenance Treatment With Rituximab

NCT02433522 ↗

RandomizedParallel-groupDouble-blindTreatment

Summary

MAINRITSAN study compared Rituximab and azathioprine as maintenance therapy for ANCA-associated vasculitides. In this study, Rituximab (5 infusions at D1, D15, M6, M12, M18) was superior to azathioprine (2 mg/kg/day) to prevent relapses of AAV 28 months after the inclusion (Guillevin et al. NEJM 2014). Nevertheless, in the follow-up study of MAINRITSAN, up to 30% of patients experienced a relapse 38 months after the last rituximab infusion (unpublished data). Right now, no randomized controlled study has been carried in order to evaluate the best duration of the maintenance treatment with rituximab. The investigators objective is to evaluate the efficacy of a long term rituximab treatment to prevent relapses of ANCA-associated vasculitis in patients in remission after a first phase of rituximab maintenance treatment. The investigators will conduct a randomized placebo-controlled trial of a long term rituximab maintenance treatment (46 months) against a conventional maintenance treatment (18 months).

Timeline

Start
2015-03-31
Primary completion
2018-08-16
Completion
2018-08-16

Outcome

Met primary endpoint

paper Relapse-free survival estimates at month 28 were 96% (95% CI, 91% to 100%) and 74% (CI, 63% to 88%) in the rituximab and placebo PMID 32479166 ↗

paper an absolute difference of 22% (CI, 9% to 36%) with a hazard ratio of 7.5 (CI, 1.67 to 33.7) (P = 0.008). PMID 32479166 ↗

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Subject Rituximab Monoclonal antibody 500 mg —