Assessment of Community Transmission of Sabin Type 2 Virus in Bangladesh

Summary

The Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) has set a plan to replace trivalent oral polio vaccine (tOPV) with bivalent OPV (bOPV) plus inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) in routine immunization globally, to be instituted in 2015-2016. At the community level, the impact of the change from tOPV + IPV to bOPV + IPV on Sabin virus fecal-oral transmission (duration of circulation, degree of genetic reversion) and the persistence of environmental contamination are unknown. Also unknown is the impact of the change from tOPV to bOPV on community circulation of Sabin 2 after a special immunization (SI) activity with monovalent oral poliovirus type 2 (mOPV2). Finally it is unknown at the level of an individual child if type 2 fecal shedding will be limited by cross-protection from oral vaccination with Sabin type 1 and 3. The investigators propose to measure at a community level transmission of Sabin 2 virus in Bangladesh, a low income country, where fecal-oral transmission and environmental exposures are high, comparing transmission in the setting of vaccination with tOPV+IPV vs. bOPV+IPV. The study will be conducted in 67 villages in Matlab, Bangladesh, using a cluster-randomized study design. Villages in Matlab will be randomly assigned to receive as part of routine immunization (RI) activities: (1) tOPV (6,10,14 weeks) plus IPV at 14 weeks; (2) bOPV (6,10, 14 weeks) plus IPV at 14 weeks; or (3) bOPV (6,10, 14 weeks) plus IPV at 14 and 18 weeks. Community and environmental surveillance for Sabin 2 virus will be conducted in each village over the 9 month period of these RI activities. In addition, a SI activity with mOPV2 will occur 9 months into the study to model an outbreak response. For the 6 months following the mOPV2 challenge, the impact of the different vaccination regimens on Sabin 2 transmission in the community will be determined, as well as individual level protection (as measured by fecal shedding from days 7-70 after mOPV2 challenge).

Timeline

Start

2015-04

Primary completion

2016-07

Completion

2017-06

Outcome

Missed primary endpoint

paper did not differ between children immunised with bOPV and one or two doses of IPV and those who received tOPV PMID 28693854 ↗

paper odds ratio [OR] 1·29, 95% CI 0·45-3·72; p=0·310 PMID 28693854 ↗

Publications

• Background Taniuchi M, Begum S, Uddin MJ, Platts-Mills JA, Liu J, Kirkpatrick BD, Chowdhury AH, Jamil KM, Haque R, Petri WA Jr, Houpt ER. Kinetics of poliovirus shedding following oral vaccination as measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR versus culture. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jan;53(1):206-11. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02406-14. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
• Famulare M, Wong W, Haque R, Platts-Mills JA, Saha P, Aziz AB, Ahmed T, Islam MO, Uddin MJ, Bandyopadhyay AS, Yunus M, Zaman K, Taniuchi M. Multiscale model for forecasting Sabin 2 vaccine virus household and community transmission. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Dec 21;17(12):e1009690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009690. eCollection 2021 Dec.
• Taniuchi M, Famulare M, Zaman K, Uddin MJ, Upfill-Brown AM, Ahmed T, Saha P, Haque R, Bandyopadhyay AS, Modlin JF, Platts-Mills JA, Houpt ER, Yunus M, Petri WA Jr. Community transmission of type 2 poliovirus after cessation of trivalent oral polio vaccine in Bangladesh: an open-label cluster-randomised trial and modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Oct;17(10):1069-1079. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30358-4. Epub 2017 Jul 7.

Drugs

Evaluation	Drug	Modality	Dose	Route
Subject	bivalent OPV	Vaccine	—	Oral
Subject	inactivated polio vaccine	Vaccine	—	—
Subject	trivalent oral polio vaccine	Vaccine	—	Oral

Indications

No indication recorded.