drugset / Trial / NCT02705274
PRP vs Bevacizumab for PDR Treatment
RandomizedParallel-groupOpen-labelTreatment
Summary
Protocol S by DRCR.net has shown that receive Ranibizumab as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy with deferred panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) are non-inferior to those in eyes that receive standard prompt PRP therapy, however with some visual functional benefits and less complications with Ranibizumab arm. Applying Protocol S in real world scenario may add cost burden to the patient as patients need about 7 injections per year which will cost the patient about 7000 US dollars a year as minimum The primary objective of this protocol is to determine the visual acuity outcomes at 1 year in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) using Bevacizumab 1.25 mg instead of Ranbizumab to lower the cost burden
Timeline
- Start
- 2016-02
- Primary completion
- 2017-04
- Completion
- 2017-05
Publications
- Results Marashi A, Abukhalaf I, Alfaraji R, Choman Y, Salahieh A (2017) Panretinal Photocoagulation versus Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Treatment. Adv Ophthalmol Vis Syst 7(1): 00211. DOI: 10.15406/aovs.2017.07.00211
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bevacizumab | Monoclonal antibody | 1.25 mg | Intravitreal |