drugset / Trial / NCT02970318

A Study of Acalabrutinib vs Investigator's Choice of Idelalisib Plus Rituximab or Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in R/R CLL

NCT02970318 ↗

Phase 3 Active not recruiting 310 enrolled Acerta Pharma BV
RandomizedParallel-groupSingle-blindTreatment

Summary

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of acalabrutinib compared with rituximab in combination with idelalisib or bendamustine in previously treated subjects with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Timeline

Start
2017-02-02
Primary completion
2021-09-03
Completion
2027-10-01

Outcome

Met primary endpoint

registry Arm A: Acalabrutinib Monotherapy vs Arm B: Investigators Choice; p <0.0001; Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.31 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.49) NCT02970318 ↗

paper median PFS was significantly longer with acalabrutinib monotherapy (PFS not reached) compared with investigator's choice (16.5 months [95% CI, 14.0 to 17.1 months]; hazard ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.49]; P < .0001). PMID 32459600 ↗

release “the Phase III ASCEND (ACE-CL-309) trial in relapsed or refractory CLL, which recently met its primary endpoint” astrazeneca.com ↗

release “The trial previously met the primary endpoint of Independent Review Committee-assessed progression-free survival at the interim analysis.” astrazeneca.com ↗

release “ASCEND Phase III trial showed AstraZeneca’s Calquence (acalabrutinib) maintained a statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit at three years” astrazeneca.com ↗

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Subject Acalabrutinib Small molecule — —
Comparator Bendamustine Small molecule — —
Comparator Idelalisib Small molecule — —
Comparator Rituximab Monoclonal antibody — —