Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert Versus Double Balloon Catheter for Preinduction Cervical Ripening

Summary

Effıcacy of dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double- balloon catheter among women in the induction of labor

Timeline

Start

2016-11

Primary completion

2017-04

Completion

2017-04

Publications

• Background Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Agosti M, Serati M, Marchitelli G, Bolis P. A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):125.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
• Background Connolly KA, Kohari KS, Rekawek P, Smilen BS, Miller MR, Moshier E, Factor SH, Stone JL, Bianco AT. A randomized trial of Foley balloon induction of labor trial in nulliparas (FIAT-N). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):392.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.034. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
• de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.

Drugs

Indications

No indication recorded.