A 24-week Study to Compare Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (UMEC/VI), UMEC and Salmeterol in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Summary
COPD is characterized by an airflow limitation, which is not fully reversible, usually progressive and accompanied by chronic cough, sputum production and dyspnea, which can be a major cause of disability and anxiety associated with the disease. In addition, COPD is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Pharmacologic therapy is used to improve lung function, reduce symptoms, reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations, and also to improve health status and exercise tolerance. This is a multi-center, randomized, double blind, double dummy, 3-arm parallel group study to compare umeclidinium/vilanterol (62.5/25 microgram \[mcg\], once daily), umeclidinium (62.5 mcg, once daily), and salmeterol (50 mg, twice daily) in male and female subjects with COPD. The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate improvements in lung function for subjects treated with UMEC/VI compared with UMEC for 24 weeks. Approximately 2424 subjects will be randomized across 3 parallel arms in 1:1:1 ratio. Subjects will be stratified based on long-acting bronchodilator usage during the run-in period (none, one or 2 long-acting bronchodilators per day). Subjects will receive either UMEC/VI inhalation powder (62.5/25 microgram \[mcg\] once daily) administered via the ELLIPTA® dry powder inhaler (DPI) and placebo twice daily via DISKUS® DPI; or UMEC (62.5 mcg once daily) administered via the ELLIPTA DPI and placebo twice daily via DISKUS DPI or salmeterol (50 mcg twice daily \[BID\]) administered via the DISKUS DPI and placebo once daily via ELLIPTA DPI. The duration of the study will be 29 to 31 weeks including a pre-screening period of 2 weeks, run-in period of 4 weeks, treatment period of 24 weeks and follow-up period of 1 week. ELLIPTA and DISKUS are trademarks of GSK group of companies.
Timeline
- Start
- 2017-06-16
- Primary completion
- 2018-06-18
- Completion
- 2018-06-18
Publications
- Background Maltais F, Bjermer L, Kerwin EM, Jones PW, Watkins ML, Tombs L, Naya IP, Boucot IH, Lipson DA, Compton C, Vahdati-Bolouri M, Vogelmeier CF. Efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium and salmeterol monotherapies in symptomatic patients with COPD not receiving inhaled corticosteroids: the EMAX randomised trial. Respir Res. 2019 Oct 30;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1193-9.
- Kerwin EM, Jones PW, Bjermer LH, Maltais F, Boucot IH, Naya IP, Lipson DA, Compton C, Tombs L, Vogelmeier CF. How can the findings of the EMAX trial on long-acting bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease be applied in the primary care setting? Chron Respir Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;20:14799731231202257. doi: 10.1177/14799731231202257.
- Bjermer LH, Boucot IH, Vogelmeier CF, Maltais F, Jones PW, Tombs L, Compton C, Lipson DA, Kerwin EM. Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Current and Former Smokers with COPD: A Prespecified Analysis of The EMAX Trial. Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4815-4835. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01855-y. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
- Maltais F, Naya IP, Vogelmeier CF, Boucot IH, Jones PW, Bjermer L, Tombs L, Compton C, Lipson DA, Kerwin EM. Salbutamol use in relation to maintenance bronchodilator efficacy in COPD: a prospective subgroup analysis of the EMAX trial. Respir Res. 2020 Oct 22;21(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01451-8.
- Kerwin EM, Boucot IH, Vogelmeier CF, Maltais F, Naya IP, Tombs L, Jones PW, Lipson DA, Keeley T, Bjermer L. Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;14:1753466620926949. doi: 10.1177/1753466620926949.
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Salmeterol | Other / unclassified | 50 ug | Inhaled |
| Subject | Umeclidinium | Other / unclassified | 62.5 ug | Inhaled |
| Subject | Vilanterol | Other / unclassified | 25 ug | Inhaled |