Comparison Between Microneedling Daycare Procedure and Tazarotene 0.1% Gel Local Application in Acne Scarring

Summary

Post acne scarring is a common complication of acne. Cosmetic appearance of the post acne facial scarring can be improved by various methods. Among the procedural methods microneedling (1) is a novel and a promising option. It is a minimally invasive day care procedure for the management of atrophic acne scars. Topical tazarotene 0.1% gel is an effective medical method in the management of acne vulgaris and macular acne scars (2, 3). Based on its mechanism of action and role in collagen synthesis, topical tazarotene is a logical choice to investigate for the management of atrophic post acne scars. This is a pilot study comparing microneedling and topical tazarotene for the treatment of atrophic post acne scarring in regard to extent and rapidity of improvement, patient satisfaction and any adverse events if any. Thirty six subjects with grade 2 to grade 4 atrophic post acne scars, classified on the basis of Goodman's Qualitative classification (4) criteria will be recruited. Goodman's qualitative and quantitative acne scarring grading system scoring will be performed for the assessment of severity of acne scarring at baseline. The face of each patient will be randomized for monthly microneedling on one side and topical tazarotene 0.1 % gel once a day local application on opposite side, using computer generated random number table. Follow ups will be done at every month until treatment completion (3 months) and 3 months after the last treatment session. Goodman's qualitative and quantitative acne scarring grading system scoring will be performed at 3rd and 6th month follow up visits. An improvement by two grades will be considered as excellent, one grade will be rated as good and no up gradation will be labelled as poor response. Patients will be also assessed by a blinded observer for clinical improvement and scored on a scale of 0 (no improvement) to 10 (maximum) at 3rd and 6th month follow up visits with the help of serial photographs taken under consistent background, position and lighting. All patients will be instructed to assess themselves using Patients' Global Assessment Score 0 (no response) to 10 (maximum) at 3rd and 6th month follow up visits. The investigators hope the outcome of the present study may propose a newer medical modality for acne scarring, i.e topical tazarotene 0.1% gel, which can be used at home, obviating the need for physician dependant microneedling procedure.

Timeline

Start

2017-06-02

Primary completion

2018-02-28

Completion

2018-03-29

Publications

• Background Doddaballapur S. Microneedling with dermaroller. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2009 Jul;2(2):110-1. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.58529.
• Background Webster GF, Guenther L, Poulin YP, Solomon BA, Loven K, Lee J. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized comparison study of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily tazarotene 0.1% gel and adapalene 0.1% gel for the treatment of facial acne vulgaris. Cutis. 2002 Feb;69(2 Suppl):4-11.
• Background Phillips TJ, Gottlieb AB, Leyden JJ, Lowe NJ, Lew-Kaya DA, Sefton J, Walker PS, Gibson JR; Tazarotene Cream Photodamage Clinical Study Group. Efficacy of 0.1% tazarotene cream for the treatment of photodamage: a 12-month multicenter, randomized trial. Arch Dermatol. 2002 Nov;138(11):1486-93. doi: 10.1001/archderm.138.11.1486.
• Background Goodman GJ, Baron JA. Postacne scarring: a qualitative global scarring grading system. Dermatol Surg. 2006 Dec;32(12):1458-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32354.x.
• Afra TP, Razmi T M, Narang T, Dogra S, Kumar A. Topical Tazarotene Gel, 0.1%, as a Novel Treatment Approach for Atrophic Postacne Scars: A Randomized Active-Controlled Clinical Trial. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Mar 1;21(2):125-132. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1404.

Drugs

Indications

No indication recorded.