Ertapenem Administered Subcutaneously Versus Intravenously

Summary

Infections requiring intravenous antimicrobial therapy are very common events in patients with advanced cancer. Nevertheless, these patients frequently present vascular damages becoming extremely difficult to access and maintain intravenous route for hydration and nutritional support. In this context, the subcutaneous route could be implemented as an alternative route for replacement of fluids, electrolytes and drugs. Few studies have evaluated the possibility of using the subcutaneous route for treatment of infections though. Patients in palliative care often have infections caused by multidrug resistant bacterial such as beta-lactamase producing bacteria. In this context, we hypothesize Ertapenem subcutaneously is not inferior to the same drug intravenously for the treatment of urinary infections in patients on oncologic palliative care. A non-inferiority clinical trial would be adequate and could provide stronger evidence on the possibility of this alternative route for antibiotic therapy in urinary tract infections, with important advantages such as greater convenience of use.

Timeline

Start

2017-06-01

Primary completion

2021-02-28

Completion

2021-02-28

Publications

• Background Forestier E, Gros S, Peynaud D, Levast M, Boisseau D, Ferry-Blanco C, Labe A, Lecomte C, Rogeaux O. [Ertapenem administered intravenously or subcutaneously for urinary tract infections caused by ESBL producing enterobacteriacea]. Med Mal Infect. 2012 Sep;42(9):440-3. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2012.07.005. Epub 2012 Aug 25. French.
• Background Frasca D, Marchand S, Petitpas F, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Couet W, Mimoz O. Pharmacokinetics of ertapenem following intravenous and subcutaneous infusions in patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Feb;54(2):924-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00836-09. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
• Background Grigoryan L, Trautner BW, Gupta K. Diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections in the outpatient setting: a review. JAMA. 2014 Oct 22-29;312(16):1677-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.12842.
• Background Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG; CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2594-604. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.87802.
• Background Tomera KM, Burdmann EA, Reyna OG, Jiang Q, Wimmer WM, Woods GL, Gesser RM; Protocol 014 Study Group. Ertapenem versus ceftriaxone followed by appropriate oral therapy for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in adults: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Sep;46(9):2895-900. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.9.2895-2900.2002.

Drugs

Indications