Oral Versus Intravenous Sedation for Ocular Procedures

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction after eye surgery when given a capsule compared to an intravenous (IV) dose of sedation (calming medication). Each subject will be given a capsule and an IV in the hospital before their procedure starts, however they will not know which one is the sedation route. Each subject will have their planned surgical procedure as previously discussed with their doctor. After the procedure is completed, the doctors will complete satisfaction surveys. The subject will also complete a satisfaction survey during their regularly scheduled visit the day after surgery. Once the subject completes this survey, their study participation will be complete. The hypothesis is that there will be no difference in patient satisfaction when given a capsule in comparison to IV sedation. If the results of the study support this hypothesis, a capsule could be used in place of IV sedation. By using a capsule for ocular procedures, both patients and the medical practice would benefit: patient would be able to eat before their procedure, patient costs would be decreased, hospital costs would be reduced, and some of these procedures would be given the option to move to a procedure room (freeing up operating room time for other departments).

Timeline

Start

2017-10-16

Primary completion

2019-11-30

Completion

2019-11-30

Publications

• Background Ianchulev T, Litoff D, Ellinger D, Stiverson K, Packer M. Office-Based Cataract Surgery: Population Health Outcomes Study of More than 21 000 Cases in the United States. Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
• Background American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Anesthesiology. 2011 Mar;114(3):495-511. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fcbfd9. No abstract available.
• Background Campbell J. Intravenous cannulation: potential complications. Prof Nurse. 1997 May;12(8 Suppl):S10-3.
• Background Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters; Apfelbaum JL, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG; American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation; Pasternak LR, Arens JF, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Fleisher LA, Flowerdew R, Gold BS, Mayhew JF, Nickinovich DG, Rice LJ, Roizen MF, Twersky RS. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2012 Mar;116(3):522-38. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c1067. No abstract available.
• Results Fung D, Cohen M, Stewart S, Davies A. Can the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale be used to measure patient satisfaction with cataract care under topical local anesthesia and monitored sedation at a community hospital? Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1637-1643. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154203.00434.23.
• Results Erdurmus M, Aydin B, Usta B, Yagci R, Gozdemir M, Totan Y. Patient comfort and surgeon satisfaction during cataract surgery using topical anesthesia with or without dexmedetomidine sedation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 May-Jun;18(3):361-7. doi: 10.1177/112067210801800308.

Drugs

Indications

No indication recorded.