drugset / Trial / NCT03408639

Comparing Efficacy and Safety of CinnaGen Beta Erythropoietin (CinnaPoietin®) Versus Eprex® on the Treatment of Anemia in ESRD Hemodialysis Patients

NCT03408639 ↗

Phase 3 Completed 156 enrolled Cinnagen
RandomizedParallel-groupQuadruple-blindTreatment

Summary

This Phase III, randomized, two-armed, parallel, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial is designed to compare efficacy and safety of CinnaPoietin® (Beta erythropoietin) and Eprex® (epoetin alpha) on the treatment of anemia in 156 End-Stage Renal Disease hemodialysis patients. 156 patients have been planned to randomize and assign to receive CinnaPoietin® or Eprex® for a 26-week period. Administration dose for patients who are treated with erythropoietin is the similar dose of the previously administered amount (IV or SC without any change). After then, dose adjustment will be made based on patients' response. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of CinnaPoietin® with Eprex®. The secondary objectives of this study are further comparison and evaluation of efficacy along with safety between CinnaPoietin® and Eprex®.

Timeline

Start
2016-06-22
Primary completion
2017-07-19
Completion
2017-07-19

Outcome

Met primary endpoint

paper CONCLUSION: CinnaPoietin® was proved to be non-inferior to Eprex® in the treatment of anemia in ESRD hemodialysis patients. PMID 30253403 ↗

Publications

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Subject CinnaPoietin® Unknown 60 iu/kg Intravenous
Comparator Eprex Unknown 60 iu/kg Intravenous
Background Nephrovit Unknown — —
Background Vitamin B12 Other / unclassified 100 ug Intramuscular

Indications