drugset / Trial / NCT04072328
Propofol vs. Midazolam With Propofol for Sedative Endoscopy in Patients With Previous Paradoxical Reaction to Midazolam
RandomizedParallel-groupDouble-blindSupportive care
Summary
This study is to compare propofol vs. midazolam with propofol for sedative endoscopy in patients with previous paradoxical reaction to midazolam. Patients who meet eligibility criteria will randomly assigned to propofol group or midazolam with propofol group. Then they will receive a sedative endoscopy with close monitoring. The primary outcome is the prevalence of paradoxical response during endoscopy.
Timeline
- Start
- 2018-10-19
- Primary completion
- 2020-08-10
- Completion
- 2020-12-20
Publications
- Background Lee TH, Lee CK, Park SH, Lee SH, Chung IK, Choi HJ, Cha SW, Moon JH, Cho YD, Hwangbo Y, Kim SJ. Balanced propofol sedation versus propofol monosedation in therapeutic pancreaticobiliary endoscopic procedures. Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Aug;57(8):2113-21. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2234-0. Epub 2012 May 22.
- Results Tae CH, Kang KJ, Min BH, Ahn JH, Kim S, Lee JH, Rhee PL, Kim JJ. Paradoxical reaction to midazolam in patients undergoing endoscopy under sedation: Incidence, risk factors and the effect of flumazenil. Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Aug;46(8):710-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
- Results Mancuso CE, Tanzi MG, Gabay M. Paradoxical reactions to benzodiazepines: literature review and treatment options. Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Sep;24(9):1177-85. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.13.1177.38089.
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator | Midazolam | Small molecule | — | — |
| Subject | Propofol | Small molecule | 0.5 mg/kg | — |
Indications
No indication recorded.