drugset / Trial / NCT05473949
Ketofol Versus Propofol for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients.
RandomizedParallel-groupTriple-blindOther
Summary
This study is a double blind randomized controlled trial. The investigators randomized ASA III and IV patients who underwent cholangiopancreatography. The investigators gave Propofol or Ketofol and compared the outcomes. The primary outcome was security (respiratory depression / hypoventilation).
Timeline
- Start
- 2016-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2017-03-31
- Completion
- 2017-03-31
Publications
- Background Standard for basis anesthetic monitoring - Committee of Origin: Standards and Practice Parameters; Approved by the ASA House of Delegates on October 21, 1986, and last amended on October 20, 2010 with an effective date of July 1, 2011
- Background Statement on nonoperating room anesthetizing locations - Committee of origin: Standards and Practice Parameters; Approved by the ASA House of Delegates in October 19,1994, and last amended on October 16, 2013
- Results Green SM, Andolfatto G, Krauss B. Ketofol for procedural sedation? Pro and con. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 May;57(5):444-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Jan 14. No abstract available.
- Results Ronald D. Miller, Miller's Anesthesia, 7th edition, Section III - Anesthetic Pharmacology, Chapter 26: Intravenous Anesthetics, p. 724
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator | Ketamine | Small molecule | — | — |
| Comparator | Propofol | Small molecule | 6 mg/kg | — |
| Comparator | Propofol | Small molecule | 7 mg/kg | — |
Indications
No indication recorded.