drugset / Trial / NCT00337103

E7389 Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracyclines and Taxanes

NCT00337103 ↗

Phase 3 Completed 1276 enrolled Eisai Inc.
RandomizedParallel-groupOpen-labelTreatment

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare E7389 versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who are refractory to the most recent chemotherapy. This is an open-label, randomized, two-parallel arm study. Patients will be randomized to receive either E7389 or capecitabine on a one-to-one ratio.

Timeline

Start
2006-09-20
Primary completion
2012-03-12
Completion
2017-12-11

Outcome

Missed primary endpoint

paper Median OS times for eribulin (n = 554) and capecitabine (n = 548) were 15.9 and 14.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.00; P = .056). PMID 25605862 ↗

paper Median PFS times for eribulin and capecitabine were 4.1 and 4.2 months, respectively (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.25; P = .30). PMID 25605862 ↗

paper In this phase III study, eribulin was not shown to be superior to capecitabine with regard to OS or PFS. PMID 25605862 ↗

Publications

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Comparator Capecitabine Small molecule 1250 mg/m2 Oral
Subject Eribulin Small molecule 1.4 mg/m2 Intravenous

Indications