Trial of Colistin Versus Meropenem in Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP) (CR-GNB)

Summary

1. To demonstrate that colistin iv. is not inferior to meropenem in empiric treatment of VAP regarding the final point of primary efficacy: mortality in the 28 subsequent days and clinical healing in patients clinically evaluated. 2. To compare the safety of treatment with colistin vs meropenem in VAP. 3. To compare microbiological efficacy of treatment with colistin vs meropenem in VAP

Timeline

Start

2012-05

Primary completion

2015-12

Completion

2015-12

Publications

• Cisneros JM, Rosso-Fernandez CM, Roca-Oporto C, De Pascale G, Jimenez-Jorge S, Fernandez-Hinojosa E, Matthaiou DK, Ramirez P, Diaz-Miguel RO, Estella A, Antonelli M, Dimopoulos G, Garnacho-Montero J; Magic Bullet Working Group WP1. Colistin versus meropenem in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (Magic Bullet study): an investigator-driven, open-label, randomized, noninferiority controlled trial. Crit Care. 2019 Nov 28;23(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2627-y.
• Rosso-Fernandez C, Garnacho-Montero J, Antonelli M, Dimopoulos G, Cisneros JM; MagicBullet study group. Safety and efficacy of colistin versus meropenem in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia as part of a macro-project funded by the Seventh Framework Program of the European Commission studying off-patent antibiotics: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Mar 20;16:102. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0614-4.

Drugs

Indications