A Study to Evaluate Pazopanib in Comparison to Pemetrexed in Maintenance Setting in Non-progressing Subjects With Metastatic Stage IVA and IVB Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Population
Summary
This is a Phase II, randomized, open-label, multi-center study in advanced (Stage IVA and IVB subjects per the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) 2009 Lung cancer staging schema) non-squamous NSCLC subjects comparing pazopanib relative to pemetrexed in the maintenance setting. Subjects should have completed 4-6 cycles of induction therapy with carboplatin + pemetrexed or cisplatin + pemetrexed and have had Stable Disease (SD), Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR) as the best response to be enrolled into the study. The primary objective is to estimate the hazard ratio of progression free survival (PFS) in advanced NSCLC subjects given maintenance therapy of pazopanib (Arm A) relative to pemetrexed (Arm B). The secondary objectives are: overall survival, response rates, safety and tolerability. A total of approximately 200 subjects will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Safety and efficacy assessments will be regularly performed on all subjects.
Timeline
- Start
- 2011-02
- Primary completion
- 2012-07
- Completion
- 2012-07
Outcome
Missed primary endpoint
registry analysis (superiority or other test); Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 vs Pazopanib 800 mg; Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.92 (90% CI 0.32 to 2.65) NCT01313663 ↗
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pazopanib | Small molecule | 800 mg | Oral |
| Comparator | Pemetrexed | Small molecule | 500 mg/m2 | Intravenous |