Cabazitaxel Compared to Topotecan for the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer

Summary

Primary Objective: To demonstrate progression free survival (PFS) improvement for cabazitaxel compared to topotecan in participants with sensitive or resistant/refractory small cell lung cancer following a first line platinum based chemotherapy. Secondary Objectives: * To assess disease progression free rate at 12 weeks * To assess Response Rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor \[RECIST\] 1.1) and duration of response * To assess Overall Survival (OS) * To assess the Safety (National Cancer Institute - Common Toxicity Criteria \[NCI-CTC\] version 4.03) * To assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)

Timeline

Start

2012-03

Primary completion

2014-04

Completion

2014-04

Publications

• Beaumont H, Evans TL, Klifa C, Guermazi A, Hong SR, Chadjaa M, Monostori Z. Discrepancies of assessments in a RECIST 1.1 phase II clinical trial - association between adjudication rate and variability in images and tumors selection. Cancer Imaging. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40644-018-0186-0.
• Evans TL, Cho BC, Udud K, Fischer JR, Shepherd FA, Martinez P, Ramlau R, Syrigos KN, Shen L, Chadjaa M, Wolf M. Cabazitaxel Versus Topotecan in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Progressive Disease During or After First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Aug;10(8):1221-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000588.

Drugs

Indications