drugset / Trial / NCT01533272

Study Comparing Two Alternatives of Antiretroviral Therapy as Post-exposure Prophylaxis to HIV-1:FOVIR+EMTRICITABINA + LOPINAVIR/RITONAVIR VS TENOFOVIR+EMTRICITABINA + MARAVIROC (MARAVI-PEP)

NCT01533272 ↗

Phase 4 Completed 240 enrolled Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
RandomizedParallel-groupOpen-labelPrevention

Summary

As a measure of secondary prophylaxis, and with the final objective of avoiding the infection, it has been suggested to use antiretroviral therapy. This is known as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Although there are different recommendations, almost every guideline recommend using 3 drugs as PEP both in USA and Europe. Toxicity is one of the main limitations of PEP. Side effects during PEP are very usual, are attributed mainly to PI and are the main reasons for poor adherence or lost of follow-up. A current standard regimen is AZT+3TC (Combivir®) or tenofovir+emtricitabine (Truvada®) plus the PI lopinavir/r. Toxicity associated with this regimens are high (31-85% of cases), with a 10-35% interruption of PEP Maraviroc, a CCR5 receptor antagonist, very well tolerated, coul be an adequate drug for PEP.

Timeline

Start
2012-02
Primary completion
2014-06
Completion
2014-06

Outcome

Missed primary endpoint

paper ritonavir-boosted lopinavir 44% (n = 51) versus maraviroc 32% (n = 38), P = 0.05 PMID 26994091 ↗

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Comparator Lopinavir Other / unclassified 400 mg —
Subject Maraviroc Other / unclassified 300 mg —
Background Ritonavir Other / unclassified 100 mg —
Background Tenofovir Small molecule 245 mg —
Background emtricitabine Other / unclassified 200 mg —