drugset / Trial / NCT01564784

A Study Of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Versus Investigator's Choice Of Chemotherapy In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

NCT01564784 ↗

Phase 3 Completed 326 enrolled Pfizer UCB Pharma · collab
RandomizedParallel-groupOpen-labelTreatment

Summary

This study will compare the efficacy, in terms of complete responses and overall survival, of inotuzumab ozogamicin versus investigator's choice of chemotherapy.

Timeline

Start
2012-08-02
Primary completion
2016-03-08
Completion
2017-01-04

Outcome

Sources disagree · no verdict is set; each source's reading is shown below

registry Inotuzumab Ozogamicin vs Defined Investigator's Choice of Chemotherapy; p <0.0001; Rate difference 51.4 reads as met primary endpoint NCT01564784 ↗

registry Inotuzumab Ozogamicin vs Defined Investigator's Choice of Chemotherapy; p = 0.0105; Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.751 (97.5% CI 0.568 to 0.993) reads as met primary endpoint NCT01564784 ↗

release “INO-VATE ALL met its first primary endpoint of complete response, which was significantly better with inotuzumab ozogamicin compared to chemotherapy” reads as mixed primary results pfizer.com ↗

release “The second primary endpoint of OS showed a strong trend toward longer OS” reads as mixed primary results pfizer.com ↗

release “but did not reach the level of statistical significance (p < 0.0104) for the trial” reads as mixed primary results pfizer.com ↗

Publications

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Comparator Cytarabine Small molecule 200 mg/m2 Intravenous
Comparator Cytarabine Small molecule 2 g/kg Intravenous
Comparator Cytarabine Small molecule 3 g/kg Intravenous
Comparator Fludarabine Small molecule 30 mg/m2 Intravenous
Subject Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Monoclonal antibody 0.5 mg/m2 Intravenous
Comparator Mitoxantrone Small molecule 12 mg/m2 Intravenous