drugset / Trial / NCT01575873

Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab Compared With Risedronate in Individuals Taking Glucocorticoids

NCT01575873 ↗

Phase 3 Completed 795 enrolled Amgen
RandomizedParallel-groupTriple-blindTreatment

Summary

This is a 2-year study to evaluate the effect of denosumab versus risedronate in adults with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Timeline

Start
2012-03-28
Primary completion
2016-06-21
Completion
2017-06-29

Outcome

Met primary endpoint

registry analysis (non-inferiority test); Risedronate: Glucocorticoid-initiating vs Denosumab: Glucocorticoid-initiating; p < 0.001; LS Mean Difference 2.9 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.9) NCT01575873 ↗

paper Denosumab was superior to risedronate in increasing lumbar spine and total hip BMD at all time points assessed, among glucocorticoid-initiating patients PMID 30816640 ↗

release “a Phase 3 study evaluating Prolia compared with risedronate in patients receiving glucocorticoid treatment met primary and secondary endpoints at 12 months.” amgen.com ↗

release “study evaluating the safety and efficacy of Prolia ® (denosumab) compared with risedronate in patients receiving glucocorticoid treatment. The study met all primary and secondary endpoints” amgen.com ↗

release “In August, a Phase 3 study evaluating Prolia compared with risedronate in patients receiving glucocorticoid treatment met primary and secondary endpoints at 12 months.” amgen.com ↗

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Subject Denosumab Monoclonal antibody 60 mg Subcutaneous
Subject Risedronate Small molecule 5 mg Oral