drugset / Trial / NCT02666157

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Among Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

NCT02666157

RandomizedParallel-groupOpen-labelTreatment

Summary

1. The recent development of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), could potentially overcome many drawbacks of warfarin, and might provide a safer, and even more effective and convenient alternative approach to warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), especially in Asians. 2. According to the results of a meta-analysis comparing Asians and non-Asians, NOACs are preferentially indicated in Asians in terms of both efficacy and safety. 3. There is no randomized controlled trial with sufficient power to directly compare the efficacy and safety among NOACs in NVAF, not to speak of Asians and Chinese. 4. Indirect comparisons are only based on observation with a lot of limitations such as heterogeneous background characteristics, difference in study design, and diversity in time within therapeutic range in control group. The findings from indirect comparisons are not conclusive but only hypothesis-generating. 5. This investigator-initiated prospective randomized open blinded end-point clinical trial will directly compare the efficacy and safety among 3 NOACs in patients with NVAF in Taiwan. We hypothesize that rivaroxaban or apixaban is non-inferior to dabigatran in terms of the efficacy.

Timeline

Start
2016-01
Primary completion
2018-12
Completion
2018-12

Publications

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Comparator Apixaban Small molecule 2.5 mg Oral
Comparator Apixaban Small molecule 5 mg Oral
Comparator Dabigatran etexilate Unknown 110 mg Oral
Comparator Dabigatran etexilate Unknown 150 mg Oral
Comparator Rivaroxaban Other / unclassified 10 mg Oral
Comparator Rivaroxaban Other / unclassified 15 mg Oral
Comparator Rivaroxaban Other / unclassified 20 mg Oral

Indications