drugset / Trial / NCT03046290
Pudendal Block Versus Penian Block For Circumcision In Children
RandomizedParallel-groupTriple-blindOther
Summary
The authors study the efficacy of the pudendal versus penile block for the relief of postoperative pain in children receiving ambulatory circumcision. In this prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm trial, 60 children recruited during the anesthesia consultation will be allocated a general anesthesia with a pudendal block (PUD group) or a penile block (PEN group). Each block will be made with equal parts lidocaine 1% and ropivacaine 0.75% (0.3 ml/kg).
Timeline
- Start
- 2017-01
- Primary completion
- 2017-04
- Completion
- 2017-04
Publications
- Background Naja Z, Al-Tannir MA, Faysal W, Daoud N, Ziade F, El-Rajab M. A comparison of pudendal block vs dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision in children: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2011 Sep;66(9):802-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06753.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
- Background Faraoni D, Gilbeau A, Lingier P, Barvais L, Engelman E, Hennart D. Does ultrasound guidance improve the efficacy of dorsal penile nerve block in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Oct;20(10):931-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03405.x.
- Background O'Sullivan MJ, Mislovic B, Alexander E. Dorsal penile nerve block for male pediatric circumcision--randomized comparison of ultrasound-guided vs anatomical landmark technique. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Dec;21(12):1214-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03722.x.
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator | Lidocaine | Other / unclassified | — | Other |
| Comparator | Ropivacaine | Other / unclassified | — | Other |
Indications
No indication recorded.