NEOadjuvant Chemotherapy Only Compared With Standard Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Summary
The main clinical hypothesis is that compared to radio-chemotherapy for low and mid rectal tumors or surgery for high rectal tumors neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces the rate of distant relapse without increasing the rate of local relapse. The aim of the present study is to compare long term and short term outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing standard treatment (radio-chemotherapy/surgery) or experimental neoadjuvant chemotherapy/surgery Furthermore, early surgical and medical complications, the functional outcome, toxicity and quality of life (QoL) may be improved if radiotherapy can be avoided. Exploratory analyses are planned in order to find potential predictive markers for selecting patients to either radio-chemotherapy/surgery or neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy/surgery.
Timeline
- Start
- 2017-03-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-12-31
- Completion
- 2024-12-31
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator | Capecitabine | Small molecule | 825 mg/m2 | — |
| Comparator | Capecitabine | Small molecule | 1000 mg/m2 | — |
| Subject | Leucovorin | Small molecule | 400 mg/m2 | — |
| Subject | Oxaliplatin | Small molecule | 85 mg/m2 | — |
| Subject | Oxaliplatin | Small molecule | 130 mg/m2 | — |
| Subject | fluorouracil | Small molecule | 400 mg/m2 | — |
| Subject | fluorouracil | Small molecule | 2400 mg/m2 | — |