Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid Versus Ciprofloxacin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Women
Summary
This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus oral ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) in adult women
Timeline
- Start
- 2018-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2020-01-16
- Completion
- 2020-01-20
Outcome
Sources disagree · no verdict is set; each source's reading is shown below
paper In the nonsusceptible population, sulopenem was superior to ciprofloxacin, 62.6% vs 36.0% (difference, 26.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15.1 to 7.4; P <.001). reads as mixed primary results PMID 36069202 ↗
paper In the susceptible population, sulopenem was not noninferior to ciprofloxacin, 66.8% vs 78.6% (difference, -11.8%; 95% CI, -18.0 to 5.6). reads as mixed primary results PMID 36069202 ↗
release “The SURE-1 clinical trial (uUTIs) demonstrated statistical superiority of oral sulopenem to the widely used comparator, ciprofloxacin, for the primary efficacy endpoint” reads as met primary endpoint iterumtx.com ↗
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator | Ciprofloxacin | Small molecule | 250 mg | Oral |
| Subject | Sulopenem | Small molecule | — | Oral |
| Background | Probenecid | Small molecule | — | Oral |