Comparison of Misoprostol Ripening Efficacy With Dilapan

Summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if Dilapan works as well as Misoprostol for preparing the mouth of the uterus (cervix) for inducing labor in women who need to undergo this procedure. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of Dilapan for cervical ripening compared to Misoprostol in women undergoing Induction of labor (IOL) at or more than 37 weeks gestation.

Timeline

Start

2018-11-15

Primary completion

2021-07-21

Completion

2021-07-21

Outcome

Met primary endpoint

paper The proportion of women achieving vaginal delivery within 36 hours was higher with mechanical cervical dilation compared with misoprostol (61.6% vs 59.2%), with an absolute difference of 2.4% (95% CI -9% to 13%), indicating noninferiority for the prespecified margin. PMID 35675605 ↗

Publications

• de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.
• Gavara R, Saad AF, Wapner RJ, Saade G, Fu A, Barrow R, Nalgonda S, Bousleiman S, Almonte C, Alnafisee S, Holman A, Burgansky A, Heikkila P. Cervical Ripening Efficacy of Synthetic Osmotic Cervical Dilator Compared With Oral Misoprostol at Term: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 1;139(6):1083-1091. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004799. Epub 2022 May 2.

Drugs

Indications

No indication recorded.