Effectiveness of Prokinetic Agents in Improving Abdominal Discomfort at Colonoscopy

Summary

colonoscopy has been a preferred modality for colorectal screening which efficiently reduce in morbidity and mortality of the disaese. Although colonoscopy is a safe procedure, some patients may be suffered from major and minor complications. Abdominal discomfort (approximately 30%) usually persisted for 2 days after colonoscopy. These unsatisfactory experiences might affect the patients' willingness to return for a repeat colonoscopy, which the loss of adherence eventually reduce the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Furthermore, during colonoscopy preparation, the patients are required to take large volume Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage (PEG-EL) solution for bowel preparation which possibly lead to unpleasant gastrointestinal symptoms likewise. Prokinetic agents are a class of drugs that promoted gastrointestinal motility and, thereby, decrease transit time. This stimulatory effect was considered clinically relevant to the management of disorders characterized by impaired motility, such as gastro-esophageal reflux, gastroparesis, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, and colonic inertia. Prokinetic agents have various mechanism such as Cholinergic agonists, Dopamine antagonists (i.e.Domperidone, Metoclopramide), Serotonergic agonists (i.e. Cisapride, Prucalopride,Mosapride). Interestingly, these drugs have been used to minimize the unpleasant abdominal symptoms from colonoscopy. The objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of a prokinetic agent in alleviating abdominal discomfort during the period of colonoscopy preparation and aftercolonoscopy consecutively.

Timeline

Start

2019-09-16

Primary completion

2022-10-30

Completion

2023-02-01

Publications

• Background Quigley EMM. Prokinetics in the Management of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Sep 8;19(10):53. doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0593-6.
• Results Panteris V, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ. Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009 Nov;41(11):941-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215179. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
• Results de Jonge V, Sint Nicolaas J, van Baalen O, Brouwer JT, Stolk MF, Tang TJ, van Tilburg AJ, van Leerdam ME, Kuipers EJ; SCoPE consortium. The incidence of 30-day adverse events after colonoscopy among outpatients in the Netherlands. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun;107(6):878-84. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.40. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
• Results Pignone M, Saha S, Hoerger T, Mandelblatt J. Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jul 16;137(2):96-104. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00007.
• Results Mishima Y, Amano Y, Okita K, Takahashi Y, Moriyama N, Ishimura N, Furuta K, Ishihara S, Adachi K, Kinoshita Y. Efficacy of prokinetic agents in improving bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Digestion. 2008;77(3-4):166-72. doi: 10.1159/000141040. Epub 2008 Jun 25.

Drugs

Indications

No indication recorded.