drugset / Trial / NCT04204343

Comparing Analgesic Effects of Caudal and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Pediatrics Undergoing Upper Abdominal Surgery

NCT04204343 ↗

Completed 60 enrolled Istanbul University
RandomizedParallel-groupTriple-blindScreening

Summary

Upper abdominal surgeries are painful and pediatric patients who undergo these operations require effective postoperative pain control. Epidural and caudal blocks are considered to be the gold standard regional analgesia techniques. Currently, ultrasound guidance is commonly used for caudal block performances to demonstrate the cannula placement and the deposition of local anesthetic. Additionally, erector spinae plane block can be a safer alternative for blocking the similar dermatomes. In this study, the aim is to compare postoperative analgesic effects of these two ultrasound-guided techniques in pediatric patients. The primary outcome of this study is the follow-up of FLACC/VAS pain scores. Secondary outcomes are time to first analgesic requirement, number of patients who require rescue analgesic, possible side effects, time to first mobilization, length of hospital stay and chronic pain due to incision after 2 months.

Timeline

Start
2019-01-01
Primary completion
2022-01-15
Completion
2022-02-25

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Comparator Bupivacaine Other / unclassified 0.5 unknown Other
Comparator Bupivacaine Other / unclassified 0.7 unknown Other

Indications

No indication recorded.