Head-to-Head Comparison of All Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Products for Glabellar Rhytides

Summary

Study Type: This is a multicenter, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Purpose: The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of all commercially available Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A (BoNT-A) products for treating glabellar rhytides, commonly known as frown lines. This study is designed to provide comprehensive data on how these treatments compare in terms of improving frown lines and the duration of their effects. Main Questions the Study Aims to Answer: Which BoNT-A product provides the longest lasting effect on reducing glabellar rhytides? How do these products compare in terms of safety and the occurrence of side effects? Participant Tasks: Women aged 18 years or older with moderate to severe glabellar lines will participate. Participants will receive injections of a BoNT-A product into specific facial muscles. They will need to take weekly photographs using their smartphones to document changes in their frown lines. These photos will be securely sent to our research team for analysis. Participants will complete questionnaires at the start and end of the study to assess their satisfaction, quality of life, and any changes in their condition. Comparison Group: Researchers will compare participants receiving different types of BoNT-A products to see which one is more effective at reducing frown lines and maintaining these effects over time. The safety profiles of these products will also be compared to determine which has the fewest and least severe side effects. This study aims to fill important gaps in our understanding of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A treatments, guiding more effective clinical decisions and improving patient outcomes.

Timeline

Start

2026-02-02

Primary completion

2027-01-01

Completion

2027-02-01

Publications

• Background Decates T, de Wijs L, Nijsten T, Velthuis P. Numbers on injectable treatments in the Netherlands in 2016. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Aug;32(8):e328-e330. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14877. Epub 2018 Mar 6. No abstract available.
• Background Decates TS, Velthuis P, Zarringam D, Bruin L, Schepers RH, van der Lei B. Upward trend in number of injectable treatments in the Netherlands 2016-2019. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Sep;20(9):3049-3051. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14339. Epub 2021 Jul 19. No abstract available.
• Background Steenen SA, Bauland CG, de Lange J, van der Lei B. Complications After Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A and Dermal Filler Injections: Data From a Large Retrospective Cohort Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Jan 9;43(1):NP56-NP63. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac228. No abstract available.
• Background Jia Z, Lu H, Yang X, Jin X, Wu R, Zhao J, Chen L, Qi Z. Adverse Events of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;40(5):769-77. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0682-1. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
• Background Zargaran D, Zoller FE, Zargaran A, Mosahebi A. Complications of facial cosmetic botulinum toxin A injection: analysis of the UK Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency registry and literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):392-401. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.074. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
• Background Gostimir M, Liou V, Yoon MK. Safety of Botulinum Toxin A Injections for Facial Rejuvenation: A Meta-Analysis of 9,669 Patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jan-Feb 01;39(1):13-25. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002169. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
• Background Zargaran D, Zoller F, Zargaran A, Rahman E, Woollard A, Weyrich T, Mosahebi A. Complications of Cosmetic Botulinum Toxin A Injections to the Upper Face: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Apr 12;42(5):NP327-NP336. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac036.
• Background Li X, Sui C, Xia X, Chen X. Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Feb;47(1):365-377. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03018-y. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
• Background Kerscher M, Fabi S, Fischer T, Gold M, Joseph J, Prager W, Rzany B, Yoelin S, Roll S, Klein G, Maas C. IncobotulinumtoxinA Demonstrates Safety and Prolonged Duration of Effect in a Dose-Ranging Study for Glabellar Lines. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021 Oct 1;20(10):1052-1060. doi: 10.36849/JDD.6377.
• Background Polacco MA, Singleton AE, Barnes CH, Maas C, Maas CS. A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial to Determine Effects of Increasing Doses and Dose-Response Relationship of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Glabellar Rhytids. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 May 18;41(6):NP500-NP511. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa220.
• Background Joseph J, Moradi A, Lorenc ZP, Coleman K, Ablon G, Kaufman-Janette J, Cox SE, Campbell A, Dayan S, Berg AK, Munavalli G. AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Dose-Escalating, Double-Blind Study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021 Sep 1;20(9):980-987. doi: 10.36849/jdd.6263.
• Background Lorenc ZP, Adelglass JM, Avelar RL, Baumann L, Beer KR, Cohen JL, Cox SE, Dayan SH, Dover JS, Downie JB, Draelos ZD, Goldman MP, Gross JE, Joseph JH, Kaufman-Janette J, Moy RL, Nestor M, Schlessinger J, Smith SR, Weiss RA. The Second of Two One-Year, Multicenter, Open-Label, Repeat-Dose, Phase II Safety Studies of PrabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Nov 12;41(12):1423-1438. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa382.
• Background Taylor SC, Grimes PE, Joseph JH, Jonker A, Avelar RL. PrabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients With Skin of Color: Post Hoc Analyses of the US Phase III Clinical Study Data. Dermatol Surg. 2021 Apr 1;47(4):516-521. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002864.
• Background Dayan S, Joseph J, Moradi A, Lorenc ZP, Coleman K, Ablon G, Kaufman-Janette J, Cox SE, Campbell A, Munavalli G, Prygova I. Subject satisfaction and psychological well-being with escalating abobotulinumtoxinA injection dose for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Jun;21(6):2407-2416. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14906. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
• Background Bertucci V, Solish N, Kaufman-Janette J, Yoelin S, Shamban A, Schlessinger J, Snyder D, Gallagher C, Liu Y, Shears G, Rubio RG. DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection has a prolonged duration of response in the treatment of glabellar lines: Pooled data from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Apr;82(4):838-845. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.1313. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
• Background Steenen SA, Bauland CG, van der Lei B, Su N, van Engelen MDG, Anandbahadoer-Sitaldin RDRRAL, Koeiman W, Jawidan T, Hamraz Y, Lange J. Head-to-head comparison of 4 hyaluronic acid dermal fillers for lip augmentation: A multicenter randomized, quadruple-blind, controlled clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 Apr;88(4):932-935. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Nov 9. No abstract available.
• Background Shome D, Kapoor R, Khare S. Two different types of botulinum toxins: Is there a difference in efficacy and longevity? J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019 Dec;18(6):1635-1641. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12949. Epub 2019 May 28.
• Background Bohart Z, Dashtipour K, Kim H, Schwartz M, Zuzek A, Singh R, Nelson M. Real-world differences in dosing and clinical utilization of OnabotulinumtoxinA and AbobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of upper limb spasticity. Toxicon. 2024 Apr;241:107678. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2024.107678. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
• Background Honeck P, Weiss C, Sterry W, Rzany B; Gladys study group. Reproducibility of a four-point clinical severity score for glabellar frown lines. Br J Dermatol. 2003 Aug;149(2):306-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05436.x.

Drugs

Indications

No indication recorded.