Pioglitazone Versus Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes

Summary

Type 2 diabetes is an epidemic. Its long-term consequences translate into enormous human suffering and economic costs; however, much of the morbidity associated with long-term microvascular and neuropathic complications can be substantially reduced by interventions that achieve glucose levels close to the nondiabetic range. However, none of the recent intervention studies has demonstrated a benefit of intensive glycemic control on their primary CVD outcomes. The investigators report the findings of a long-term randomized and comparator-controlled clinical trial conducted in patients with newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes. The investigators compared the effect of pioglitazone with that of metformin on circulating endothelial cell-derived submicroscopic membranous vesicles, termed microparticles: because of their putative role in inflammatory processes and their ability to directly affect endothelial functions, they are gaining increasing popularity as a surrogate marker of cardiovascular outlook. Metformin was chosen as a comparator because the American Diabetes Association recommendations suggest to start therapy in newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetic subjects combining a drug (metformin) with lifestyle changes. Moreover, the mechanism of action of pioglitazone is distinct from that of metformin.

Timeline

Start

2007-10

Primary completion

2015-03

Completion

2015-04

Publications

• Background Mazzone T, Meyer PM, Feinstein SB, Davidson MH, Kondos GT, D'Agostino RB Sr, Perez A, Provost JC, Haffner SM. Effect of pioglitazone compared with glimepiride on carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Dec 6;296(21):2572-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.21.joc60158. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

Drugs

Indications