Clinical Phase III Trial Treosulfan-based Conditioning Versus Reduced-intensity Conditioning (RIC)
Summary
This randomized allogeneic transplantation protocol compares i.v. Treosulfan-based conditioning therapy with reduced intensity i.v. Busulfan-based conditioning in adult AML and MDS patients at increased risk for standard conditioning therapies. The protocol is based on results of previous phase I/II trials evaluating Treosulfan/Fludarabine conditioning prior to allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The reference arm (reduced intensity i.v. Busulfan/Fludarabine) is considered to be accepted medical practice for the study patient population.
Timeline
- Start
- 2008-11-24
- Primary completion
- 2018-01-25
- Completion
- 2018-01-25
Outcome
Met primary endpoint
paper At the second preplanned interim analysis (Nov 9, 2016), the primary endpoint was met and trial was stopped. PMID 31606445 ↗
paper HR 0·65 [95% CI 0·47-0·90]; p<0·0001 for non-inferiority, p=0·0051 for superiority PMID 31606445 ↗
release “The publication concludes that the study demonstrates clinically relevant superiority of treosulfan over RIC busulfan with regard to its primary endpoint, EFS.” medexus.com ↗
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator | Busulfan | Small molecule | 0.8 mg/kg | Intravenous |
| Subject | Treosulfan | Small molecule | 10 g | Intravenous |