Comparing Sedara to Butorphanol in Early Labor

Summary

Nitrous oxide (N2O) has been used for the treatment of labor pains for over 150 years. The longevity of its use in clinical practice can be attributed to its excellent safety profile, ease of administration, and familiarity of use among health-care providers. Sedara is a self-administered 50% N2O, 50% oxygen gas mixture with pain relieving and anxiety reducing properties recently available for use in the United States (US) to treat various painful clnical situations, including labor pains. In the US, epidural or intravenous administration of narcotic medications is one of the most common and frequently requested treatments for patients experiencing labor pains. Although generally considered safe, complications are common with epidurals, including fetal distress, low blood pressure in the mother, respiratory distress, and headache. In our hospital system, the use of the synthetic intravenous painkiller, Butorphanol, is a mainstay of treatment for labor pains. It too can have undesirable side effects in the mother, including low blood pressure and breathing problems. Because Sedara has until recently been unavailable in the US, studies comparing its efficacy with other agents for labor pain have been confined to Europe, predominantly in the United Kingdom. Several studies have investigated the efficacy of Sedara versus inhalation and intravenous anesthetics in various countries. We have obtained several Sedara devices for use in the West Penn Allegheny Health System (WPAHS) Department of Anesthesiology and would like to examine its efficacy in our target population of women experiencing pain during early labor. Hypothesis - Sedara will provide equivalent or superior pain relief among term, adult parturients in early labor (less than 5cm cervical dilation) compared to intravenous butorphanol. Primary aim - Compare Sedara versus butorphanol in a single-blinded randomized trial with the main outcome measure being reduction in labor pains at various time intervals. Our findings may be significant in terms of improving safety and efficacy of pain relief among women experienceing labor pains. Given that Sedara has not been previously studied in the US, the results may influence current obstetrical and pain management practices.

Timeline

Start

2012-09

Primary completion

2014-09

Completion

2014-09

Publications

• Background Volmanen P, Palomaki O, Ahonen J. Alternatives to neuraxial analgesia for labor. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;24(3):235-41. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328345ad18.
• Background Rosen MA. Nitrous oxide for relief of labor pain: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;186(5 Suppl Nature):S110-26. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.121259.
• Background Maslekar S, Gardiner A, Hughes M, Culbert B, Duthie GS. Randomized clinical trial of Entonox versus midazolam-fentanyl sedation for colonoscopy. Br J Surg. 2009 Apr;96(4):361-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6467.
• Background Young P, Emery NC, Reisin R. Epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):395. No abstract available.
• Background Viscomi CM. Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Mar;87(3):480-2. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)82976-0. No abstract available.
• Background Dickinson JE, Paech MJ, McDonald SJ, Evans SF. Maternal satisfaction with childbirth and intrapartum analgesia in nulliparous labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Dec;43(6):463-8. doi: 10.1046/j.0004-8666.2003.00152.x.
• Background Yeo ST, Holdcroft A, Yentis SM, Stewart A, Bassett P. Analgesia with sevoflurane during labour: ii. Sevoflurane compared with Entonox for labour analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jan;98(1):110-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael327.
• Background Volmanen P, Akural E, Raudaskoski T, Ohtonen P, Alahuhta S. Comparison of remifentanil and nitrous oxide in labour analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Apr;49(4):453-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00639.x.
• Background Talebi H, Nourozi A, Jamilian M, Baharfar N, Eghtesadi-Araghi P. Entonox for labor pain: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Pak J Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 1;12(17):1217-21. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2009.1217.1221.
• Background Kelly AM. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;5(11):1086-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02667.x.
• Background Yamamoto LG, Nomura JT, Sato RL, Ahern RM, Snow JL, Kuwaye TT. Minimum clinically significant VAS differences for simultaneous (paired) interval serial pain assessments. Am J Emerg Med. 2003 May;21(3):176-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(02)42255-3.
• Background Lee JS, Hobden E, Stiell IG, Wells GA. Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Oct;10(10):1128-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00586.x.

Drugs

Indications

No indication recorded.