drugset / Trial / NCT02913261

Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy in Patients With Corticosteroid-refractory Acute Graft vs. Host Disease After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

NCT02913261 ↗

Phase 3 Completed 310 enrolled Novartis Pharmaceuticals
RandomizedParallel-groupOpen-labelTreatment

Summary

Assess the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib compared to Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with corticosteroid-refractory acute graft vs. host disease (aGvHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Timeline

Start
2017-03-10
Primary completion
2019-06-24
Completion
2021-04-23

Outcome

Met primary endpoint

paper Overall response at day 28 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group PMID 32320566 ↗

registry analysis (superiority test); Ruxolitinib (RUX) vs Best Available Therapy (BAT); p <.0001; Odds Ratio (OR) 2.64 (95% CI 1.65 to 4.22) NCT02913261 ↗

release “Results of randomized Phase 3 REACH2 trial show that ruxolitinib significantly improves overall response rate (ORR) at 28 days vs. best available therapy” incyte.com ↗

release “REACH2, the first Phase 3 study of ruxolitinib in acute GVHD to have met its primary endpoint” incyte.com ↗

release “Results from the REACH2 trial showed that overall response rate (ORR) at Day 28 was superior in the Jakavi arm at 62.3% vs. 39.4%” novartis.com ↗

Publications

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Comparator Etanercept Protein / enzyme biologic — —
Comparator Everolimus Small molecule — —
Comparator Infliximab Monoclonal antibody — —
Comparator Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Cell therapy — —
Comparator Methotrexate Small molecule — —
Comparator Mycophenolate Mofetil Small molecule — —
Subject Ruxolitinib Small molecule 10 mg Oral
Comparator Sirolimus Small molecule — —