Intranasal Versus Intravenous Drug in Painful Procedure for Outpatient Oncologic Participants

Summary

Pain is a vital sign that depends on personal experience involving different factors such as previous sensory and emotional experience, age, spiritual and cultural aspects, that makes it harder to evaluate, especially in young children. Pain control is important to diminish the anxiety of the child and family, also this is more important in patients who require procedure and treatment that are more painful, like oncological and hematological patients. The study aims to measure if the intranasal drugs (dexmedetomidine and fentanyl) has the same outcomes when compared with intravenous drug (ketamine and midazolam), but with less side effects. The participants are patients from an oncologic outpatient, that will be submitted to cerebrospinal fluid puncture, myelogram or both will be randomized assigned to both groups. The study will compare physiological variables ( heart rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure) and sedation and pain scales to see if its work properly. The study purpose is to evaluate if intranasal drug works in the same way with less side effects comparing with the usual treatment.

Timeline

Start

2021-06-01

Primary completion

2021-09

Completion

2021-12

Publications

• Background Manworren RC, Stinson J. Pediatric Pain Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2016 Aug;23(3):189-200. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
• Background Fantacci C, Fabrizio GC, Ferrara P, Franceschi F, Chiaretti A. Intranasal drug administration for procedural sedation in children admitted to pediatric Emergency Room. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):217-222. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201801_14120.
• Background Li BL, Zhang N, Huang JX, Qiu QQ, Tian H, Ni J, Song XR, Yuen VM, Irwin MG. A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children administered either by atomiser or by drops. Anaesthesia. 2016 May;71(5):522-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.13407. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
• Background Tug A, Hanci A, Turk HS, Aybey F, Isil CT, Sayin P, Oba S. Comparison of Two Different Intranasal Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Children for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sedation. Paediatr Drugs. 2015 Dec;17(6):479-85. doi: 10.1007/s40272-015-0145-1.
• Background Jun JH, Kim KN, Kim JY, Song SM. The effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Sep;64(9):947-961. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0917-x. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
• Background Gupta A, Dalvi NP, Tendolkar BA. Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam as premedication for brain magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients: A prospective randomized double blind trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):236-240. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_204_16.
• Background Chatrath V, Kumar R, Sachdeva U, Thakur M. Intranasal Fentanyl, Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine as Premedication in Pediatric Patients. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):748-753. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_97_18.
• Background Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, Samson RA, Hazinski MF, Atkins DL, Berg MD, de Caen AR, Fink EL, Freid EB, Hickey RW, Marino BS, Nadkarni VM, Proctor LT, Qureshi FA, Sartorelli K, Topjian A, van der Jagt EW, Zaritsky AL. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S876-908. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971101. No abstract available.

Drugs

Indications