The Effectiveness of Topical Prilocaine-Lidocaine Cream Plus Acetaminophen and Naproxen Compared to Lidocaine Injection Plus Acetaminophen and Naproxen to Manage Pain During IntraUterine Device Insertion
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if two pain medications used to treat pain during intrauterine device insertions work in persons with a uterus. It will also learn about the safety of the two study medications. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does prilocaine lidocaine, acetaminophen and naproxen or lidocaine injection, acetaminophen and naproxen reduce pain during intrauterine device insertions. Researchers will compare prilocaine lidocaine cream and lidocaine injection to see if it treats pain during an intrauterine device insertion. Participants will be asked to: * take acetaminophen and naproxen prior to the procedure. * receive either prilocaine-lidocaine or lidocaine injection during the procedure * to fill out a survey on past medical history, anxiety, and pain.
Timeline
- Start
- 2026-04-14
- Primary completion
- 2027-04-14
- Completion
- 2027-04-14
Publications
- Background Kirubarajan A, Gryn A, Werger M, Salim S, Ivanisevic S, Liu J, Wang S, Huszti E, Jacobson M, Flamer D, Spitzer RF, Sobel M. A double-blind, triple-arm randomized controlled trial of 1% lidocaine paracervical block for intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Contraception. 2026 Aug;160:111393. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2026.111393. Epub 2026 Jan 24.
- Background Tavakolian S, Doulabi MA, Baghban AA, Mortazavi A, Ghorbani M. Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream as Analgesia for IUD Insertion: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Triple Blinded Study. Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Jan 27;7(4):399-404. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n4p399.
- Background Samy A, Abbas AM, Mahmoud M, Taher A, Awad MH, El Husseiny T, Hussein M, Ramadan M, Shalaby MA, El Sharkawy M, Hatem D, Alaa-El-Din Wali A, Abd-El-Fatah SM, Hussein AH, Haggag H. Evaluating different pain lowering medications during intrauterine device insertion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2019 Mar;111(3):553-561.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.11.012. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
- Background Nguyen L, Lamarche L, Lennox R, Ramdyal A, Patel T, Black M, Mangin D. Strategies to Mitigate Anxiety and Pain in Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Systematic Review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Sep;42(9):1138-1146.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Dec 25.
- Background Karasu Y, Comert DK, Karadag B, Ergun Y. Lidocaine for pain control during intrauterine device insertion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Jun;43(6):1061-1066. doi: 10.1111/jog.13308. Epub 2017 May 15.
- Background Mody SK, Farala JP, Jimenez B, Nishikawa M, Ngo LL. Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement Among Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):575-582. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002790.
- Background Lopes-Garcia EA, Carmona EV, Monteiro I, Bahamondes L. Assessment of pain and ease of intrauterine device placement according to type of device, parity, and mode of delivery. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2023 Jun;28(3):163-167. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2023.2189500. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
- Background Hunter TA, Sonalkar S, Schreiber CA, Perriera LK, Sammel MD, Akers AY. Anticipated Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Feb;33(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
- Background Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available.
- Background de Oliveira ECF, Baeta T, Brant APC, Silva-Filho A, Rocha ALL. Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01521-z.
- Background Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman W, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM, Mansouri S. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 7--Intrauterine Contraception. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Feb;38(2):182-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Feb 26. English, French.
- Background Bayer LL, Ahuja S, Allen RH, Gold MA, Levine JP, Ngo LL, Mody S. Best practices for reducing pain associated with intrauterine device placement. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May;232(5):409-421. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.039. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
- Background Akers AY, Steinway C, Sonalkar S, Perriera LK, Schreiber C, Harding J, Garcia-Espana JF. Reducing Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Adolescents and Young Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):795-802. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002242.
- Background Abbas AM, Abdellah MS, Khalaf M, Bahloul M, Abdellah NH, Ali MK, Abdelmagied AM. Effect of cervical lidocaine-prilocaine cream on pain perception during copper T380A intrauterine device insertion among parous women: A randomized double-blind controlled trial. Contraception. 2017 Mar;95(3):251-256. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator | Lidocaine | Other / unclassified | 1 % | Topical |
| Comparator | Lidocaine | Other / unclassified | 10 ml | Topical |
| Comparator | prilocaine | Small molecule | — | Topical |
Indications
No indication recorded.