Comparison of Two Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating stage III or stage IV Hodgkin's lymphoma. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two combination chemotherapy regimens in treating patients who have stage III or stage IV Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Timeline
- Start
- 2002-08
- Primary completion
- 2010-01
- Completion
- —
Outcome
Missed primary endpoint
paper At 4 years, EFS was 63.7% for ABVD8 versus 69.3% for BEACOPP4+4 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.15; P = .312); PMID 27114593 ↗
paper Because BEACOPP4+4 did not demonstrate a favorable effectiveness or toxicity ratio compared with ABVD8 PMID 27114593 ↗
Drugs
| Evaluation | Drug | Modality | Dose | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bleomycin | Unknown | — | Intravenous |
| Subject | Cyclophosphamide | Other / unclassified | — | Intravenous |
| Comparator | Dacarbazine | Small molecule | — | Intravenous |
| Subject | Doxorubicin | Other / unclassified | — | Intravenous |
| Subject | Etoposide | Small molecule | — | Intravenous |
| Subject | Prednisone | Other / unclassified | — | Oral |
| Comparator | Vinblastine | Small molecule | — | Intravenous |
| Subject | Vincristine | Small molecule | — | Intravenous |
| Subject | procarbazine | Small molecule | — | Oral |
| Background | Pegfilgrastim | Protein / enzyme biologic | — | Subcutaneous |
| Background | filgrastim | Protein / enzyme biologic | — | Subcutaneous |