drugset / Trial / NCT01251107

Study Comparing ABVD vs BEACOPP in Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma

NCT01251107

Phase 3 Completed 331 enrolled Fondazione Michelangelo
RandomizedSingle-groupOpen-labelTreatment

Summary

The choice of a preferred first-line treatment requires balancing the desire for optimal disease control with the occurrence of early and late treatment-related effects. To fully assess this balance, the treatment decision process should ideally take into account the outcome following a consistent second-line therapy, in particular when tolerated, widely applicable and highly effective salvage regimens exist, like in Hodgkin lymphoma failing initial chemotherapy.

Timeline

Start
2000-03
Primary completion
2009-11
Completion
2009-11

Drugs

EvaluationDrugModalityDoseRoute
Comparator Bleomycin Unknown 10 mg/m2 Intravenous
Subject Cyclophosphamide Other / unclassified 650 mg/m2 Intravenous
Subject Cyclophosphamide Other / unclassified 1250 mg/m2 Intravenous
Comparator Dacarbazine Small molecule 375 mg/m2 Intravenous
Comparator Doxorubicin Other / unclassified 25 mg/m2 Intravenous
Comparator Doxorubicin Other / unclassified 35 unknown Intravenous
Subject Etoposide Small molecule 100 mg/m2 Intravenous
Subject Etoposide Small molecule 200 mg/m2 Intravenous
Subject Prednisone Other / unclassified 40 mg/m2 Oral
Comparator Vinblastine Small molecule 6 mg/m2 Intravenous
Subject Vincristine Small molecule 1.4 mg/m2 Intravenous
Subject procarbazine Small molecule 100 mg/m2 Oral

Indications